Starring: Mark Deans, Simon Laherty, Sarah Mainwaring, Scott Price, Michael Chan, Bruce Gladwin
Distributor: Back to Back Pictures
Runtime: 56 mins. Reviewed in Jul 2023
Reviewer: Fr Peter Malone msc
A group of activists hold a public meeting, desperate to save the world. As the meeting unravels, they discover the greatest threat to their future is already in the room.
This is a brief feature film, made by the Back-to-Back Theatre group, based on a play that the group had developed over some years, Shadow, Whose Prey the Hunter Becomes. It was filmed in Geelong, and Corio Bay, but most of the action in The Playhouse.
The principal reason for seeing this film is that it focuses on men and women with disabilities, although there is a lot of discussion about the nature of disability, the use of the word, especially concerning brain function.
The film was written and performed by the cast with disabilities, and filmed mostly by a crew with disabilities, but working with professional mentors.
The dialogue of the film was worked on by its four central characters and the development of the plot is not what audiences might expect.
The cast and audience gather in the foyer of The Playhouse, the cinema audience entering with them, everyone finding a place to observe the action. Our attention has been alerted in the foyer by a rather genial character, Mark, with Down Syndrome. And we glance around to see the other men and women present, the way they look, the way they observe, most of them not contributing verbally to the action. There are some carers among the audience and a journalist who arrives late, takes notes throughout.
The is a town meeting, with Simon, middle-aged, articulate in his way, unable to explain his situation as regards ideas, thinking, expression, but continually upstaged by Scott, who explains that he has mental disability but is autistic, not hesitating to intervene, drawing on information expertise, Moody, defying Simon, sometimes walking out, but returning and intervening and intruding. But, the character who demands most attention is Sarah, 36, articulate but expressing herself slowly and deliberately. It is she who raises objections about the language of disability. She is assertive on her own condition but also what she can achieve. Along with Scott, she has the most lines. She also suggests using the language of ‘neurodiversity’.
But the situation is not what we expect. The group has the intention of bettering the world – saving it. Ideals and ideas are propounded. Simon tries to manage the meeting, Scott raises all kinds of complexities, Sarah makes known her stances, Mark in the audience, smiling, focusing on his food. The upshot of the discussion is the question about whether the world can be saved, whether this group is able to do any saving, conscious as they are of their strengths and disabilities, needing to save themselves before they can save the world.
This is a brief film that would contribute to ‘normal’ (the word used by the actors for reference) audiences understanding the nature of mental disabilities, making them pause, non-judgmental, adapting expectations, finding ways to collaborate and to contribute to understanding and appreciation. As has happened with Back-to-Back Theatre and this film.
12 Random Films…