Understanding True Kingship: Reflections on Jesus as the “Son of Man” and the “Crucified Messiah”
There is a compelling contrast between the traditional view of monarchy, as exemplified by King Charles of the British royal family, and the biblical understanding of Jesus Christ as the “Son of Man” and the “crucified Messiah.” This exploration invites us to reconsider our perceptions of power, authority, and suffering through the lens of faith.
The Changing Perception of Monarchy
RH begins by acknowledging the presence of a monarchy in Australia, noting the lack of enthusiasm among Australians for royal visits, particularly in the context of King Charles’s recent visit. This sentiment is juxtaposed with the historical reverence shown during Queen Elizabeth’s visits, suggesting a shift in cultural attitudes towards monarchy in the 21st century. RH recalls a personal experience in London during a significant moment in history—the death of Princess Diana—highlighting the emotional connection and public mourning that can accompany royal events.
Key Points:
Shift in Attitudes: The changing perception of monarchy in contemporary society. Personal Anecdote: RH’s experience in London during Princess Diana’s death, illustrating the emotional impact of royal events.
Theological Reflection on Kingship
Transitioning from this personal anecdote, RH delves into a deeper theological reflection on the concept of kingship. He emphasizes that the title of “king” in the context of Jesus is fundamentally different from the political and ceremonial kingship represented by figures like King Charles. While many may refer to Jesus as the “Christ” or “Messiah,” he often refrained from embracing these titles, as they carried connotations of a political leader who would liberate the Jewish people from Roman oppression.
Jesus as the “Son of Man”
Instead, Jesus frequently referred to himself as the “Son of Man,” a term used over 180 times in the New Testament, primarily in the Gospels. RH explains that this title signifies a shared humanity, emphasizing Jesus’s identification with the human experience. He draws a connection to the Book of Daniel, where the “Son of Man” is depicted in a vision as an exalted figure, receiving reverence from all of creation. This portrayal contrasts sharply with the traditional image of kingship, as it highlights a divine authority that transcends earthly power.
Key Points:
Title of “Son of Man”: Emphasizes Jesus’s shared humanity and identification with human experience. Biblical Reference: Connection to the Book of Daniel, where the “Son of Man” is depicted as an exalted figure.
The Implications of Jesus’s Identity
RH elaborates on the implications of Jesus’s identity as the “Son of Man.” He reflects on the biblical narrative, noting that humanity was created in the image of God and given the responsibility to reflect God’s goodness in the world. However, throughout history, various figures have failed to fulfill this role, leading to a longing for a true “Son of Man” who would embody this ideal. RH emphasizes that Jesus fulfills this role not through political power or military might but through his humility and suffering.
Key Points:
Humanity’s Role: Created in the image of God to reflect His goodness. Fulfillment in Jesus: Jesus embodies the ideal “Son of Man” through humility and suffering.
The Paradox of Jesus’s Kingship
RH then contrasts the exaltation of Jesus with the traditional expectations of kingship. Rather than ascending to a throne in glory, Jesus’s path to exaltation is marked by suffering and humiliation. RH poignantly describes the moment of Jesus’s crucifixion, where he is crowned not with a crown of glory but with a crown of thorns, stripped of royal robes and subjected to the ultimate vulnerability. This paradox of kingship challenges conventional notions of power and authority, inviting followers to reconsider what it means to serve a king who embodies suffering.
Key Points:
Path to Exaltation: Marked by suffering and humiliation. Crown of Thorns: Symbolizes the paradox of Jesus’s kingship.
Embracing Our Own Suffering
In this context, RH calls on listeners to recognize their own experiences of suffering and humiliation. He encourages individuals to bring their brokenness and pain to Jesus, the crucified Messiah, who understands and shares in their struggles. RH emphasizes that Jesus’s suffering is not a sign of weakness but a profound expression of love and solidarity with humanity. By embracing their own wounds and sorrows, individuals can find healing and transformation through their relationship with Christ.
Key Points:
Recognition of Suffering: Encourages individuals to bring their pain to Jesus. Healing and Transformation: Found through a relationship with the crucified Messiah.
Conclusion: True Kingship in Love and Humility
As RH concludes, he invites listeners to reflect on the significance of Jesus as the “Son of Man” and the “crucified Messiah.” He encourages a deeper union with God, emphasizing that true kingship is found not in power or dominance but in love, humility, and the willingness to suffer alongside others. RH’s message resonates with the idea that through Jesus’s example, individuals can find hope and redemption, even in the midst of their struggles.
Key Points:
True Kingship: Found in love, humility, and willingness to suffer alongside others. Hope and Redemption: Through Jesus’s example, individuals can find hope and redemption.
In summary, RH’s reflections offer a rich theological exploration of kingship, contrasting the earthly monarchy with the divine kingship of Jesus. His message invites us to engage with our own experiences of suffering and to seek transformation through our relationship with the crucified Messiah, ultimately leading to a deeper understanding of true identity and purpose in the context of faith.